- 31 May 11, 14:54#258612
@bulletproof
Yep I agree modern f1 had got incredibly dull and predictable. Settling down to a bit of Sunday afternoon f1, and fall asleep after lap 10. Wake up for the pitstops and then don't bother watching the last 1/3 of the race because the winner was decided. I consoled myself, and tried to remain loyal during those "parade" years by looking further down the field. Eddie Irvine, Jean Alesi, Berger to name a few.
@Coronis Yes, the changes have spiced things up a bit, and I agree it feels too artificial. Why force teams to use both compounds and allowing refuelling would certainly bring back a strategic decision that does not feel like a computer game: "Press the enter key for maximum revs...Great overtake, extra life proceed to level 3..."
@killem2 I think the incidents at Monaco have shown that the safety aspect of the sport is necessary. If you want all out adrenalin death-wish sports, then there are a whole gulf of extreme sports out there. I think f1 moved away from that image after Senna.
@frafpdd Yep we do like a good moan. British moan about about their sports the Americans bury themselves in statistics...what is it with Baseball stats?
@fred_c_dobbs Yep Newbie alert apologies to the established crowd. Just thought I would contribute to the forum. I have been reading it for a while now. You are right though the title of the post is a little arrogant.. I didn't mean it.
The key is balancing the rules for great racing and not changing them for entertainment sake. The rules should not cheapen the f1 formula. I think that Monaco was a great race where the rules seemed to create a great racing environment. It's a balancing act with a race by race tweak at the moment.
Yep I agree modern f1 had got incredibly dull and predictable. Settling down to a bit of Sunday afternoon f1, and fall asleep after lap 10. Wake up for the pitstops and then don't bother watching the last 1/3 of the race because the winner was decided. I consoled myself, and tried to remain loyal during those "parade" years by looking further down the field. Eddie Irvine, Jean Alesi, Berger to name a few.
@Coronis Yes, the changes have spiced things up a bit, and I agree it feels too artificial. Why force teams to use both compounds and allowing refuelling would certainly bring back a strategic decision that does not feel like a computer game: "Press the enter key for maximum revs...Great overtake, extra life proceed to level 3..."
@killem2 I think the incidents at Monaco have shown that the safety aspect of the sport is necessary. If you want all out adrenalin death-wish sports, then there are a whole gulf of extreme sports out there. I think f1 moved away from that image after Senna.
@frafpdd Yep we do like a good moan. British moan about about their sports the Americans bury themselves in statistics...what is it with Baseball stats?
@fred_c_dobbs Yep Newbie alert apologies to the established crowd. Just thought I would contribute to the forum. I have been reading it for a while now. You are right though the title of the post is a little arrogant.. I didn't mean it.
The key is balancing the rules for great racing and not changing them for entertainment sake. The rules should not cheapen the f1 formula. I think that Monaco was a great race where the rules seemed to create a great racing environment. It's a balancing act with a race by race tweak at the moment.