- 23 Oct 10, 14:48#221415
I guess I need to pay more attention, naa it makes my head hurt
.
"Sanity and happiness are an impossible combination".
Mark Twain
Mark Twain
F1 and Motorsport Forums
texasmr2 wrote:I guess I need to pay more attention, naa it makes my head hurt.

spankyham wrote:texasmr2 wrote:I guess I need to pay more attention, naa it makes my head hurt.
texasmr2 wrote:Thanks for the flashback I have not seen that skit in some 30yrs?Soon as I read your post it jumped straight to mind - aint you-tube grand

f1ea wrote:That's VERY reliable.When you think the only two failures attributed to Ferrari for this year are the engine changes at Bahrain, its a pretty good record for 2010. As you know those engines didn't fail, they were changed as a precaution and can be used again.
I dont remember this yr's Mclaren engine failure... other than that only 2 fails, and the prev yr only 2 as well.
No need to look at completed lap % because crashes and whatever else comes into play.
The only championship-category team on better reliability has been Brawn GP... but that was a 1-off.
Only 2 fails in 2009. 2008 and 07 were very similar...

spankyham wrote:When you think the only two failures attributed to Ferrari for this year are the engine changes at Bahrain, its a pretty good record for 2010. As you know those engines didn't fail, they were changed as a precaution and can be used again.Yeah. Although, Ferrari has had several 'issues' not failures, like the clutch on some starts, and the time Alonso blew the engine due to the gear box having an issue. The only real weak-looking car this yr was the Red Bull and it seems by now everything is fine.
It does show just how reliable the major teams have become.
f1ea wrote:Ferrari's biggest problem hardware problem now is the ECU .... and you know who makes thatspankyham wrote:When you think the only two failures attributed to Ferrari for this year are the engine changes at Bahrain, its a pretty good record for 2010. As you know those engines didn't fail, they were changed as a precaution and can be used again.Yeah. Although, Ferrari has had several 'issues' not failures, like the clutch on some starts, and the time Alonso blew the engine due to the gear box having an issue. The only real weak-looking car this yr was the Red Bull and it seems by now everything is fine.
It does show just how reliable the major teams have become.
And for example, Mclaren showed the gearbox failure after the crash, which could have been counted as 2, but somehow it shows as just one... but anyway, it 'could' have been caused by the crash. Therefore its not really a reliability issue. I still dont know what is the engine failure Mclaren reported this yr.

spankyham wrote:Ferrari's biggest problem hardware problem now is the ECU .... and you know who makes that
spankyham wrote: Ferrari's biggest problem hardware problem now is the ECU .... and you know who makes thatIts the best part on that car
spankyham wrote:Ferrari's biggest problem hardware problem now is the ECU .... and you know who makes thatWe certainly know why they didn't allow Ferrari to provide their own ECU.
vaptin wrote:Someone want to explain to me what an ECU is? Or just give me the full word so I can google it.Electronic control unit. All (modern) cars have one.
McLaren Racing opened its new state-of-the-art Rac[…]
Swap-in out addons, use only what you really need!