FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Formula One related discussion.
#209560
More like the school teacher came running onto the field and separated the muddy toddlers from further pounding each other into the ground.
#209561
More like the school teacher came running onto the field and separated the muddy toddlers from further pounding each other into the ground.


Come on man, I'm trying to stay up beat and optimistic, plus the breeze feels good.
#209562
It feels cooler in here already... it's as if someone opened up a window and in came a cool breeze. Thank you forum moderators/therapists.


They got to you man, you sell out.

You used to be cool. Proper cool that is, not what your calling cool now.


:rofl: you say sell out, I say lobotomized. Like McMurphy in One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest.
User avatar
By f1ea
#209565
It may be cool and calm here... but in Hungary they're still shooting fireballs. :hehe:
Behind the smoke and the forest fire though and the emotional questions... there were some interesting comments made by Horner, Domenicalli and Bouiller.

Still think what happened in Hockenheim was uglier than wrong. Fernando should have charged Massa even if there was the risk of a collision. Massa did it so obvious on purpose, and while making the charge may not have been the best for the team, at least they would have been able to keep playing the team order farce, like all other teams do...

In the end, people are going to use the rule as they want... still using it, while making it seem as if they are against it.
#209566
It may be cool and calm here... but in Hungary they're still shooting fireballs. :hehe:
Behind the smoke and the forest fire though and the emotional questions... there were some interesting comments made by Horner, Domenicalli and Bouiller.

Still think what happened in Hockenheim was uglier than wrong. Fernando should have charged Massa even if there was the risk of a collision. Massa did it so obvious on purpose, and while making the charge may not have been the best for the team, at least they would have been able to keep playing the team order farce, like all other teams do...

In the end, people are going to use the rule as they want... still using it, while making it seem as if they are against it.


By George I think you've got it!
#209567
It may be cool and calm here... but in Hungary they're still shooting fireballs. :hehe:
Behind the smoke and the forest fire though and the emotional questions... there were some interesting comments made by Horner, Domenicalli and Bouiller.

Still think what happened in Hockenheim was uglier than wrong. Fernando should have charged Massa even if there was the risk of a collision. Massa did it so obvious on purpose, and while making the charge may not have been the best for the team, at least they would have been able to keep playing the team order farce, like all other teams do...

In the end, people are going to use the rule as they want... still using it, while making it seem as if they are against it.


By George I think you've got it!


:rofl:

I think time of year and points difference is what rankles with me.
#209569
I think time of year and points difference is what rankles with me.


Rankles? as in Rankling? Rankled? must be a Brit term because that sounds like something illegal or immoral in most of the "Bible Belt" states.
User avatar
By f1ea
#209570
By George I think you've got it!


:rofl:

I think time of year and points difference is what rankles with me.


He he
Well, problem is... like its been said: a win on the 1st race is worth the same as in the last race. The team order rule 'applies' all over the calendar. Truth is, Ferrari were desperate in Hockenheim. And they should have been! that was their last chance to continue in the hunt.

Points difference in this case matters WITHIN the team, but as compared to competitors... its still huge. Without at least a podium in Hungary, its byebye, see you in 2011.

Massa has absolutely no chance. Not being 'mean' to him... its just true.
User avatar
By smokin
#209588
I think time of year and points difference is what rankles with me.


Rankles? as in Rankling? Rankled? must be a Brit term because that sounds like something illegal or immoral in most of the "Bible Belt" states.

It's an experimental engine. Like the Wankel but with a spring that continually winds you up.
#209593
I think time of year and points difference is what rankles with me.


Rankles? as in Rankling? Rankled? must be a Brit term because that sounds like something illegal or immoral in most of the "Bible Belt" states.

It's an experimental engine. Like the Wankel but with a spring that continually winds you up.

I thought that was what they called the rotary engines they put in those tiny little cars from Hethel. :confused:
#209601
World Motor Sport Council = John Todt = (ex)Ferrari. I am not presently buying into arguments about whether team orders are OK in F1 because I can see merits in both sides of the issue. The simple fact is that Ferrari did the wrong thing given the existing rules and the matter has been referred to the World Motor Sport Council of which the President is John Todt. He was top dog at Ferrari when the blatant application of team orders in Austria 2002 caused such an outcry that the rules were changed. What an impossible position to be in. If he somehow seeks to separate himself from the WMSC considerations of this particular case then nothing less than his resignation prior to the hearing would satisfy a lot of people, myself included. If a penalty is imposed which is generally perceived to be too lenient then WMSC will fall into disrepute (.... and the President should resign ???). If a drastic penalty is imposed because Todt feels the need to bend over backwards to appear impartial - well that wouldn't be fair either. So the big issue for debate prior to WMSC hearing is what would be a fair penalty in this case?
My view is that both drivers should be stripped of the points which they obtained at Hockenheim and the team should get a hefty fine.
#209605
World Motor Sport Council = John Todt = (ex)Ferrari. I am not presently buying into arguments about whether team orders are OK in F1 because I can see merits in both sides of the issue. The simple fact is that Ferrari did the wrong thing given the existing rules and the matter has been referred to the World Motor Sport Council of which the President is John Todt. He was top dog at Ferrari when the blatant application of team orders in Austria 2002 caused such an outcry that the rules were changed. What an impossible position to be in. If he somehow seeks to separate himself from the WMSC considerations of this particular case then nothing less than his resignation prior to the hearing would satisfy a lot of people, myself included. If a penalty is imposed which is generally perceived to be too lenient then WMSC will fall into disrepute (.... and the President should resign ???). If a drastic penalty is imposed because Todt feels the need to bend over backwards to appear impartial - well that wouldn't be fair either. So the big issue for debate prior to WMSC hearing is what would be a fair penalty in this case?
My view is that both drivers should be stripped of the points which they obtained at Hockenheim and the team should get a hefty fine.


Some very good points here. And this is why Todt should never have been appointed to that position-too much vested interest.This situation , or one very similar, was inevitable. the job should have gone to Ari! Impartial.
#209630
I read Todt had agreed to step aside for the hearing.


Thats a step in the right directin if he has. But would he still advise?
  • 1
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 42

See our F1 related articles too!