Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time. Abe Lincoln Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power. Abe Lincoln
I don't really rate Surtees just for the record. Really tough for me to choose between Moss, Clark and Stewart. Moss was probably the best all rounder ever to grace motorsport but as F1 is a specialised series, it must come down to one of the original specialists, Jackie Stewart. For me his consistency proved his absolute mastery of the machinery and gives him the edge over Clark who, for me didn't score as well under difficult circumstances in F1 as readily as Stewart
gilles27 wrote:I don't really rate Surtees just for the record. Really tough for me to choose between Moss, Clark and Stewart. Moss was probably the best all rounder ever to grace motorsport but as F1 is a specialised series, it must come down to one of the original specialists, Jackie Stewart. For me his consistency proved his absolute mastery of the machinery and gives him the edge over Clark who, for me didn't score as well under difficult circumstances in F1 as readily as Stewart
Personally I went for Clark, with Moss and Stewart a close Second and Third. I think Clark's results would have been out of this world had it not been for reliability. The same for Moss of course, but again. "What ifs"
For Moss, you could argue that he actually selected inferior machinery in order to make the challenge greater. I seem to remember reading a quote from him explaining as much. Clark would surely have won the 1967 world championship but for reliability and the 1968 championship but for that race at Hockenheim. Stewart had a knack in the wet and a level of consistency that was unprecedented until that point in F1 history and so that swings it for me. I think Clark and Stewart are almost inseparable though... Moss would win if it was 'all rounders' but for pure F1 performances, Clark and Stewart are the ones
gilles27 wrote:For Moss, you could argue that he actually selected inferior machinery in order to make the challenge greater. I seem to remember reading a quote from him explaining as much. Clark would surely have won the 1967 world championship but for reliability and the 1968 championship but for that race at Hockenheim. Stewart had a knack in the wet and a level of consistency that was unprecedented until that point in F1 history and so that swings it for me. I think Clark and Stewart are almost inseparable though... Moss would win if it was 'all rounders' but for pure F1 performances, Clark and Stewart are the ones
Your right about Moss, his patriotism to Britain cost him the title. I suppose he was very noble in driving the likes of the Vanwall. I wonder how he would have done in a Ferrari or one of the other manufacturers of the time?
Yup and he also opted to drive for privateers such as Rob Walker over works team outfits in order to 'stick it' to the big teams. Amazing attitude really but then the sport wasn't quite as big as it is now.
gilles27 wrote:Yup and he also opted to drive for privateers such as Rob Walker over works team outfits in order to 'stick it' to the big teams. Amazing attitude really but then the sport wasn't quite as big as it is now.
Nope indeed it wasn't, it's amazing really how different F1 was then compared to now. Heck F1 about a decade ago is far different! What will it be like in 10 years?
charlieone wrote:Im such a fan of Damon Hill, he gets my vote anyday!
Ive got his autograph, on a silverstone ticket. It was all i had to hand.
You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time. Abe Lincoln Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power. Abe Lincoln