FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

[What's Burning?]

So this year looks to be a nice ROTY battle. Will we see the current love affair with Bottas and Gutierrez blossom into an all season long slugfest of the two for the lead? Will we see Van der Garde manage to take a point in the Caterham and with that gain F1 history make status? What about Marussia can they have the makings for a rally with Bianchi and Chilton?

I'm certainly not casting my vote yet, but I think the ROTY title will be a much clearer choice by the time the circus gets back to the European GPs.

[Jabberwocky]

Bianchi seemed to get to grips with the Marussia straight off. Chilton seemed to flounder a bit. Further up the field I think Bottas is the way forward. They have a knack of seeing talent. Look at Hulk and Pastor.

[Coronis]

Finland has very good recent history with F1 drivers

[scotty]

Bottas or Gutierrez... Bianchi is saddled by a poor car.

Chilton is not a good driver and is only in cause of sponsorship, i think. van der Garde hasn't really done much to this point either. It's a shame we don't get to see Razia now cause he had more potential than both of these two.

[LewEngBridewell]

I've gone for Bottas... looking forward to seeing him in the Williams, and may hopefully prove to be the next Flying Finn!

Max Chilton, although he is eye candy (for me anyway) he seems like a pay-driver. His family's immense wealth (insurance industry) has paid for that seat.

[Denthúl]

Bottas, followed by Gutierrez and then Bianchi. Sadly, I don't rate the other two at all.

[Hammer278]

When I saw the thread topic my head automatically went,

[LewEngBridewell]

When I saw the thread topic my head automatically went,

[andrew]

A Google search reveals this:



Not mine but more appropriate for the thread.

[Hammer278]

That's nice, but I posted what I saw in my mind. The rookies thing was already in the thread title, so thats just repeating what WB had said.

You'll get the knack of meme's eventually.

[What's Burning?]

It used to puns, but now Internet memes are the lowest form of humor.

Rookie humor you could say.

[Jabberwocky]

sarcasm is the loest for of wit... it is also the funniest. However it does not work well on the internet.

[What's Burning?]

sarcasm is the loest for of wit... it is also the funniest. However it does not work well on the internet.

And there we find the epicenter of comedy!

[Hammer278]

It used to puns, but now Internet memes are the lowest form of humor.

Rookie humor you could say.

I agree, but sometimes people struggle to use even rookie humour appropriately.

[What's Burning?]

This is what happens when I try it... I'm such a rookie.