FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

For Formula One and Motorsport related videos and images.
#261677
when I drop something it always winds up rolling under the couch.

Are you saying that the whole of F1 will exist under your coach? I hope you have a big house? Several million F1 fans will be heading your way!
#261789
This might be a stupid question. But, with the prospect of PayTV looming, I would like clarification. :eek:

With the BBC, you can watch the coverage online, so you don't even need a TV.

If it moved to Pay TV, e.g. Sky, would that still be an option? And if not, is there any other way of watching F1 without a TV or having to attend every single race? :rolleyes:
#261792
This might be a stupid question. But, with the prospect of PayTV looming, I would like clarification. :eek:

With the BBC, you can watch the coverage online, so you don't even need a TV.

If it moved to Pay TV, e.g. Sky, would that still be an option? And if not, is there any other way of watching F1 without a TV or having to attend every single race? :rolleyes:


Yes, it would be an option as you can pay for Sky to watch online, but it's still around £25/month.
#261793
This might be a stupid question. But, with the prospect of PayTV looming, I would like clarification. :eek:

With the BBC, you can watch the coverage online, so you don't even need a TV.

If it moved to Pay TV, e.g. Sky, would that still be an option? And if not, is there any other way of watching F1 without a TV or having to attend every single race? :rolleyes:


Yes, it would be an option as you can pay for Sky to watch online, but it's still around £25/month.


Oh my goodness, more moneeeeyyyyyyy :yikes:
#261794
i would be absolutely gutted if they dropped F1 coverage.

The ratings on the BBC are consistently far far higher than they ever were on ITV, meaning that f1 is reaching a far broader audience.

The BBC's coverage is absolutely excellent, no adverts is massive but there features, interviews, presentation is just generally great and it would be such a shame for us to loose that.
#261801
It'll go to sky won't it? :thumbdown:

The bbc are cutting back, and Sky would love to show f1, see the article in the times, owned by Murdoch of course. Their angling for this, the only way is if the bbc decide to fork out when the contract is up for renewal.

Would really damage the sport in the UK, if it goes to sky, less people will see it.
#261802
I've been wondering if the BBC might be playing a bit of a game with Bernie, wanting to retain the coverage but not pay as much for it. Dropping to £40m per year would help the BBC to cut costs whilst retaining a sport that pulls in a lot of viewers. I don't know if it has been posted in this thread already, but a study by the BBC Trust has shown Formula One to be its most cost-effective sports package. With this in mind, I can't see it being dropped so easily.
#261820
Below is my full feelings on the subject as posted on my blog:

A number of newpapers, some that are owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp have been reporting that the BBC plans to drop Formula One coverage from 2014 onwards when the current five year contract expires. Apparently it’s a choice of dropping the corporations artsy fartsy channel BBC 4 or Formula 1, for me it’s a no brainer, BBC 4 gets 0.8% of all viewers while F1 brings in 10%. The reason I mention Murdoch and News Corp is because of the media giant’s recent interest in purchasing the F1 commercial rights from current owners CVC Capital. Should the sale of F1 to News Corp actually happen, we will for sure see the F1 coverage moving to Sky Television from 2014 onwards. These reports of the BBC dropping F1 has been massively inaccurate given that the newspapers concerned have been reporting viewing figures of between two and four million where the reality is an average of nearly five minute with a peak of over eight million viewers. As much as I dislike Bernie Ecclestone and his stupid ideas, medals system and artificial wet races, I’d rather have the senile old coot in charge and the sport remain free-to-air than have the whole sport transported to subscription or even worse pay-per-view television. Sure the die hard F1 fans will buy a subscription but many of the current viewers are more casual viewers who will not want to or won’t be able to afford a Sky Television subscription. Either way this is bad news for Formula 1 in general, teams sponsors will start pulling out of F1 at their earliest convenience as they won’t get the same exposure as they once did which in turn could mean teams like HRT, Virgin, Team Lotus and even Williams could find themselves forced out of F1. I know I am probably hoping for too much but Bernie could always significantly drop the cost of broadcasting Formula 1. McLaren are obviously concerned about this reported news as team principle Martin Whitmarsh has spoken out about the news that the BBC will drop F1 after the 2013 season. In the US; Formula 1 is not free-to-air apart from a few races mid-season; for the majority of the year it’s shown on motorsports channel Speed which is broadcast on cable television but that’s not a problem in the US as the following of F1 isn’t as large. It will be a crying shame if Formula 1 were to move to subscription or pay-per-view TV especially as F1 is in it’s ascendency with last seasons five way title battle and this seasons new and exciting F1 coming from the new Pirelli tyres, KERS and DRS!
#261855
Below is my full feelings on the subject as posted on my blog:

A number of newpapers, some that are owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp have been reporting that the BBC plans to drop Formula One coverage from 2014 onwards when the current five year contract expires. Apparently it’s a choice of dropping the corporations artsy fartsy channel BBC 4 or Formula 1, for me it’s a no brainer, BBC 4 gets 0.8% of all viewers while F1 brings in 10%. The reason I mention Murdoch and News Corp is because of the media giant’s recent interest in purchasing the F1 commercial rights from current owners CVC Capital. Should the sale of F1 to News Corp actually happen, we will for sure see the F1 coverage moving to Sky Television from 2014 onwards. These reports of the BBC dropping F1 has been massively inaccurate given that the newspapers concerned have been reporting viewing figures of between two and four million where the reality is an average of nearly five minute with a peak of over eight million viewers. As much as I dislike Bernie Ecclestone and his stupid ideas, medals system and artificial wet races, I’d rather have the senile old coot in charge and the sport remain free-to-air than have the whole sport transported to subscription or even worse pay-per-view television. Sure the die hard F1 fans will buy a subscription but many of the current viewers are more casual viewers who will not want to or won’t be able to afford a Sky Television subscription. Either way this is bad news for Formula 1 in general, teams sponsors will start pulling out of F1 at their earliest convenience as they won’t get the same exposure as they once did which in turn could mean teams like HRT, Virgin, Team Lotus and even Williams could find themselves forced out of F1. I know I am probably hoping for too much but Bernie could always significantly drop the cost of broadcasting Formula 1. McLaren are obviously concerned about this reported news as team principle Martin Whitmarsh has spoken out about the news that the BBC will drop F1 after the 2013 season. In the US; Formula 1 is not free-to-air apart from a few races mid-season; for the majority of the year it’s shown on motorsports channel Speed which is broadcast on cable television but that’s not a problem in the US as the following of F1 isn’t as large. It will be a crying shame if Formula 1 were to move to subscription or pay-per-view TV especially as F1 is in it’s ascendency with last seasons five way title battle and this seasons new and exciting F1 coming from the new Pirelli tyres, KERS and DRS!


:clap: Great blog. :clap:
#262089
Below is my full feelings on the subject as posted on my blog:

A number of newpapers, some that are owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp have been reporting that the BBC plans to drop Formula One coverage from 2014 onwards when the current five year contract expires. Apparently it’s a choice of dropping the corporations artsy fartsy channel BBC 4 or Formula 1, for me it’s a no brainer, BBC 4 gets 0.8% of all viewers while F1 brings in 10%. The reason I mention Murdoch and News Corp is because of the media giant’s recent interest in purchasing the F1 commercial rights from current owners CVC Capital. Should the sale of F1 to News Corp actually happen, we will for sure see the F1 coverage moving to Sky Television from 2014 onwards. These reports of the BBC dropping F1 has been massively inaccurate given that the newspapers concerned have been reporting viewing figures of between two and four million where the reality is an average of nearly five minute with a peak of over eight million viewers. As much as I dislike Bernie Ecclestone and his stupid ideas, medals system and artificial wet races, I’d rather have the senile old coot in charge and the sport remain free-to-air than have the whole sport transported to subscription or even worse pay-per-view television. Sure the die hard F1 fans will buy a subscription but many of the current viewers are more casual viewers who will not want to or won’t be able to afford a Sky Television subscription. Either way this is bad news for Formula 1 in general, teams sponsors will start pulling out of F1 at their earliest convenience as they won’t get the same exposure as they once did which in turn could mean teams like HRT, Virgin, Team Lotus and even Williams could find themselves forced out of F1. I know I am probably hoping for too much but Bernie could always significantly drop the cost of broadcasting Formula 1. McLaren are obviously concerned about this reported news as team principle Martin Whitmarsh has spoken out about the news that the BBC will drop F1 after the 2013 season. In the US; Formula 1 is not free-to-air apart from a few races mid-season; for the majority of the year it’s shown on motorsports channel Speed which is broadcast on cable television but that’s not a problem in the US as the following of F1 isn’t as large. It will be a crying shame if Formula 1 were to move to subscription or pay-per-view TV especially as F1 is in it’s ascendency with last seasons five way title battle and this seasons new and exciting F1 coming from the new Pirelli tyres, KERS and DRS!


However it's already been established that Sky don't have the money to pay for F1, it was merely a chance to boost their share price with the upcoming structural changes, and a clever way of sniffing out the market of any potential investors.

For the reasons you mentioned above, it will not ever be on pay per view.
#262116
Below is my full feelings on the subject as posted on my blog:

A number of newpapers, some that are owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp have been reporting that the BBC plans to drop Formula One coverage from 2014 onwards when the current five year contract expires. Apparently it’s a choice of dropping the corporations artsy fartsy channel BBC 4 or Formula 1, for me it’s a no brainer, BBC 4 gets 0.8% of all viewers while F1 brings in 10%. The reason I mention Murdoch and News Corp is because of the media giant’s recent interest in purchasing the F1 commercial rights from current owners CVC Capital. Should the sale of F1 to News Corp actually happen, we will for sure see the F1 coverage moving to Sky Television from 2014 onwards. These reports of the BBC dropping F1 has been massively inaccurate given that the newspapers concerned have been reporting viewing figures of between two and four million where the reality is an average of nearly five minute with a peak of over eight million viewers. As much as I dislike Bernie Ecclestone and his stupid ideas, medals system and artificial wet races, I’d rather have the senile old coot in charge and the sport remain free-to-air than have the whole sport transported to subscription or even worse pay-per-view television. Sure the die hard F1 fans will buy a subscription but many of the current viewers are more casual viewers who will not want to or won’t be able to afford a Sky Television subscription. Either way this is bad news for Formula 1 in general, teams sponsors will start pulling out of F1 at their earliest convenience as they won’t get the same exposure as they once did which in turn could mean teams like HRT, Virgin, Team Lotus and even Williams could find themselves forced out of F1. I know I am probably hoping for too much but Bernie could always significantly drop the cost of broadcasting Formula 1. McLaren are obviously concerned about this reported news as team principle Martin Whitmarsh has spoken out about the news that the BBC will drop F1 after the 2013 season. In the US; Formula 1 is not free-to-air apart from a few races mid-season; for the majority of the year it’s shown on motorsports channel Speed which is broadcast on cable television but that’s not a problem in the US as the following of F1 isn’t as large. It will be a crying shame if Formula 1 were to move to subscription or pay-per-view TV especially as F1 is in it’s ascendency with last seasons five way title battle and this seasons new and exciting F1 coming from the new Pirelli tyres, KERS and DRS!


However it's already been established that Sky don't have the money to pay for F1, it was merely a chance to boost their share price with the upcoming structural changes, and a clever way of sniffing out the market of any potential investors.

For the reasons you mentioned above, it will not ever be on pay per view.


Well, fingers crossed. :eek:
#262129
Below is my full feelings on the subject as posted on my blog:

A number of newpapers, some that are owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp have been reporting that the BBC plans to drop Formula One coverage from 2014 onwards when the current five year contract expires. Apparently it’s a choice of dropping the corporations artsy fartsy channel BBC 4 or Formula 1, for me it’s a no brainer, BBC 4 gets 0.8% of all viewers while F1 brings in 10%. The reason I mention Murdoch and News Corp is because of the media giant’s recent interest in purchasing the F1 commercial rights from current owners CVC Capital. Should the sale of F1 to News Corp actually happen, we will for sure see the F1 coverage moving to Sky Television from 2014 onwards. These reports of the BBC dropping F1 has been massively inaccurate given that the newspapers concerned have been reporting viewing figures of between two and four million where the reality is an average of nearly five minute with a peak of over eight million viewers. As much as I dislike Bernie Ecclestone and his stupid ideas, medals system and artificial wet races, I’d rather have the senile old coot in charge and the sport remain free-to-air than have the whole sport transported to subscription or even worse pay-per-view television. Sure the die hard F1 fans will buy a subscription but many of the current viewers are more casual viewers who will not want to or won’t be able to afford a Sky Television subscription. Either way this is bad news for Formula 1 in general, teams sponsors will start pulling out of F1 at their earliest convenience as they won’t get the same exposure as they once did which in turn could mean teams like HRT, Virgin, Team Lotus and even Williams could find themselves forced out of F1. I know I am probably hoping for too much but Bernie could always significantly drop the cost of broadcasting Formula 1. McLaren are obviously concerned about this reported news as team principle Martin Whitmarsh has spoken out about the news that the BBC will drop F1 after the 2013 season. In the US; Formula 1 is not free-to-air apart from a few races mid-season; for the majority of the year it’s shown on motorsports channel Speed which is broadcast on cable television but that’s not a problem in the US as the following of F1 isn’t as large. It will be a crying shame if Formula 1 were to move to subscription or pay-per-view TV especially as F1 is in it’s ascendency with last seasons five way title battle and this seasons new and exciting F1 coming from the new Pirelli tyres, KERS and DRS!


However it's already been established that Sky don't have the money to pay for F1, it was merely a chance to boost their share price with the upcoming structural changes, and a clever way of sniffing out the market of any potential investors.

For the reasons you mentioned above, it will not ever be on pay per view.


Well, fingers crossed. :eek:


Absolutely :)
#263722
Taken from TVThrong:

Channel 4 is said to be chasing the broadcast rights for the Formula One championship when the current BBC deal expires.

The network is believed to be targeting the sport as a way of attracting young male audiences that are ideal for big advertising deals.

While the broadcaster hasn’t commented on the speculation, F1 boss Bernie Ecclestone has confirmed that the rights will be staying with a free-to-air network should he have his way.

ITV is said to be interested also in the rights, after they gave it up in 2008 when the BBC agreed to the latest deal.


Certainly doesn't sound like they want it for the right reasons but if it were to leave BBC, I'd say Channel 4 is the next best bet with on demand, +1 and HD available. Plus More4 is going HD this year so maybe we'd see practise in HD which would be nice providing they bring the BBC team over.

Still I hope BBC drop Three and Four before they even contemplate getting rid of F1.
#263723
Hope it stays with the BBC. They're coverage it has to be said is incredibly good.

With Channel 4, why do I feel they'd hire some awful host who's used to presenting music shows and making half-assed jokes.

See our F1 related articles too!