For me the best way to bring the excitement back is not by allowing one driver to be protected but by getting rid of the fuel saving, tire saving, engine saving, lift and coast rules. Who wants to watch fuel economy based 'racing'.
I completely agree with this sentiment. I think it is sad that for F1 to be seen as exciting it needs to have a driver like Verstappen making some dangerous manoeuvres.
I think that most people who love racing would agree that the fuel restrictions, fast(er) degrading tires / having to use at least 2 compounds and use of artificial aids like DRS has stifled the sport. But I also believe that the blame/penalty culture in F1 has also stifled competition with drivers afraid to make a lunge down the inside for fear of a penalty if it doesn't go to plan.
Verstappen did nothing wrong in Spa according to the letter of the law, so I don't see how he is being protected and Charlie Whitting threatening him with sanctions if he drives in a similar manner at Monza is overstepping I feel. If the FIA don't want drivers to drive like Max has done, change the rules, don't threaten a driver that has not broken any rule.
I am not a particular fan of Verstappen, I felt his promotion to the senior team was premature. Maybe it's time for F1 to make it a requirement for any driver to have competed in a lower formula for at least 3 years before entering F1. Did Max even have a road drivers license before his super-license?
Many drivers like Lewis Hamilton, Daniel Ricciardo etc have said that the issue is his youth, he will learn with experience, the question is; should F1 be the proving ground for Verstappen?