Brought this over from the nico support thread, as
some of you don't seem to understand the point of a SUPPORT threadtbh its a misconception that Nico is slower than Hamilton, he has beaten Hamilton fairly in qualifying many times.
Take out Monaco and the two Lewis car blow ups and they're even. What Nico is good at is turning poles into race losses, no one has been better than him at that.
See NHcheese..how pompous the hamilton crowd is? "take out monaco and the two lewis car blows ups they're even" as if it were a fact that hamilton would have beat him. So haughty. The greater the pride, the greater the fall
Did Lewis beat Nico in quali last year? or did he beat him in the WDC? maybe best we stick to known facts when working out how the 'faster' driver who has evolved with the car gets beaten by the slower driver who has just joined
Yeah, last year, so? We're talking about THIS year. And I really don't see this as an excuse the way you do for hamilton, but rosberg was the one with 3 DNF's to lewis' 1 DNF last year, and rosberg still only lost out by about 20 points in the standings, so he likely would have beaten hamilton in the standings without those DNF's. But, as I said, I'm not using that as an excuse like you or other hamilton fans might. Facts are facts. THIS year, rosberg has been outqualifying hamilton. Not my fault if you can't handle that FACT.