- 28 Jul 14, 00:04#410653
Is it supposed to be some sort of revelation, that I even wrote this? You're bringing something up we've already discussed and disagreed on. Do you think bringing it up again will make me reconsider?
I don't see what you're getting at. Well, that's not strictly true, you're saying it was a ridiculous statement and that's why we're irrationally castigating somebody who disagrees with us.
No, you're not saying that either. What are you saying? That I shouldn't write it because it's not true? And it's not true because you say it isn't, because you know better than me?
And that if I try to find articles saying F1 drivers can be affected by stress, just to put it out there that they are human not deitys, it's a lot of psychobabble.
You can't point blank refute my points simply because they don't gel with yours.
I don't see what you're getting at. Well, that's not strictly true, you're saying it was a ridiculous statement and that's why we're irrationally castigating somebody who disagrees with us.
No, you're not saying that either. What are you saying? That I shouldn't write it because it's not true? And it's not true because you say it isn't, because you know better than me?
And that if I try to find articles saying F1 drivers can be affected by stress, just to put it out there that they are human not deitys, it's a lot of psychobabble.
You can't point blank refute my points simply because they don't gel with yours.